What We Don’t Know is Just as Important as What We Do Know - Part One


Yesterday, I checked with the Planning Department for any new information in the Cherenzia file.  A letter arrived on August 15. Cherenzia has begun an archeological study on the proposed site at Greenhaven and Mary Hall roads.  It's not yet a report ... but it is an exciting beginning.  Connect to the documents under Loop Links.

        Two reports are missing from the Cherenzia application. One is an Archeological Study.  The second is an Environmental Assessment.  Each is missing for a different reason and the lack of these reports leaves us in the dark on two important topics.  

         First, are there important historic and archeological features on the Cherenzia site that should be considered before development goes forward?  Will the disturbance of the site lead to losses in endangered plant or animal species or put in danger such important natural capital, such as aquifers?  I contend that Planning and Zoning commissioners cannot make an informed decision on behalf of Town residents if they lack such important information.

        Today, I will discuss the Archeological Study.  Later this week, I will comment on the Environmental Assessment.

        According the Stonington Zoning Regulations (6.6.24), an Archeological Study is a required document.  Such a study must be included in an application for a Special Use Permit.  The regs are very detailed and outline how to determine the need for such a study, how to conduct such a study, who is qualified to do such a review, and who, besides the Planning and Zoning Commission, needs to see the report.